Legal Opinion
Tennessee, Coal, Iron R. Co. v. Martin
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided March 16, 1948No. 6 Div. 514PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Judge.
This case was originally assigned to Presiding Judge Bricken. In the opinion prepared by Judge Bricken the facts have already been sufficiently set forth obviating the necessity of further recital thereof in this opinion.
The majority of the court being unable to concur in certain conclusions reached by Judge Bricken therefore express their conclusions below.
In the opinion on the rehearing in the Drummond case (Department of Industrial Relations v. Drummond), 30 Ala. App. 78, 1 So.2d 395, 401, this court stated that the essential purpose of the Alabama Unemployment Compensation…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Lauf v. E. G. Shinner & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- New Negro Alliance v. Sanitary Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Security Trust & Safety Vault Co. v. City of LexingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Nordling v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Usher v. Department of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Holmes v. CookCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
- St. Joe Paper Company v. GautreauxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.