A1Z7, LLC v. Dombek
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.
General Statutes § 47a-26b permits a property owner in a summary process action to seek the fair rental value of the premises occupied by a defendant during the pendency of a summary process action. The central issue in this case is whether § 47a-26b provides the exclusive remedy and, therefore, preempts an owner's ability to seek payment from the occupier for unjust enrichment for the reasonable value of the premises occupied for a time period for which § 47a-26b would not permit an order of use and occupancy payments. Because the language of the statute does not plainly and unambiguously…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Solomon v. AbermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- New England Land Co. v. DeMarkeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Bayer v. Showmotion, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- LaSalla v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Feldmann v. SebastianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Konover Development Corp. v. Waterbury Omega, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022