Legal Opinion

A1Z7, LLC v. Dombek

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 26, 2019No. AC41198PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.

General Statutes § 47a-26b permits a property owner in a summary process action to seek the fair rental value of the premises occupied by a defendant during the pendency of a summary process action. The central issue in this case is whether § 47a-26b provides the exclusive remedy and, therefore, preempts an owner's ability to seek payment from the occupier for unjust enrichment for the reasonable value of the premises occupied for a time period for which § 47a-26b would not permit an order of use and occupancy payments. Because the language of the statute does not plainly and unambiguously…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Solomon v. AbermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. New England Land Co. v. DeMarkeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Bayer v. Showmotion, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  4. LaSalla v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Feldmann v. SebastianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Konover Development Corp. v. Waterbury Omega, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API