Legal Opinion

Schnider v. M. E. H. Realty Investment Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1946PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVE, J.-

In this suit respondent (hereinafter called “plaintiff”) seeks to enjoin the maintenance by appellant (hereixiafter called “defendant” of downspouts which overhang plaintiff’s lot and connections from such downspouts to a sewer over and across plaintiff’s real estate. By cross-petition defendant seeks to enjoin plaintiff from interfering with the maintenance of such downspouts and sewer connections. After trial the court entered judgment permanently enjoining and restraining defendant from maintaining the two downspouts located on plaintiff’s land and attached to ,the east wall of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ogden v. . JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Greisinger v. KlinhardtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  3. Mahnken v. GillespieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. Berlin v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Warren v. BlakeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1866

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dressler v. IsaacsOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Cook v. Tide Water Associated Oil CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. McDougall v. CastelliMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Missouri State Oil Co. v. PessinaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  5. Marshall v. CallahanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API