Legal Opinion
Kim Long Ko v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 30, 1998No. 93-CF-1322PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
This matter was decided initially in a panel decision issued on May 8,1997, Kim Long Ko v. United States, 694 A.2d 73 (D.C.1997). We vacated that decision on November 13, 1997, in response to the government’s petition questioning part of the majority opinion regarding payment of the government’s interpreters. We now reaffirm the judgment of the trial court for the reasons set forth below.
Kim Long (Peter) Ko was convicted by a jury of extortion, in violation of D.C.Code § 22-3851 (1996); threats, in violation of § 22-2307; and unlawful possession of ammunition, in violation of § 6-2361 (1995).…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Irick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- United States of America Ex Rel. Rogelio Nieves Negron v. The State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Bernard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ledezma v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Biglari v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Dang v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Lopez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.