Family Finance Corp. v. Sniadach
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentHeffernan, J.
The majority opinion would lead one to believe that garnishment before judgment is a venerable practice of Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence and should be accorded the imprimatur of time. Yet, the fact of the matter is that this is a rather new development in Wisconsin law. The excellent brochure written by Paul L. Moskowitz for the Wisconsin Extension Law Department states:
“Chapter 267 of the Wisconsin Statutes' (1959) comes from R.S. 1878, Section 2752. The statute in Wisconsin originally provided garnishment as a remedy in aid of execution only. Many states still follow this law.” 1962 Wisconsin…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Ownbey v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Coffin Brothers & Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- State Ex Rel. White v. SimpsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Kreulhaus v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.