Legal Opinion

Cooper Agency v. McLeod

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided October 28, 1965No. Civ. A. AC-1804PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEMPHILL, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff commenced this action by filing its complaint, together with a motion for preliminary injunction, on, September 27,1965. Sought is an injunction against defendant, Harold M. McLeod, District Director of Internal Revenue, from taking any action to collect certain tax liabilities heretofore "illegally” assessed against the plaintiff, and from committing other “illegal acts and omissions” which would prevent the plaintiff from paying the amount plaintiff alleges was “legally” assessed against it, and thereafter suing for refund. Plaintiff’s cause of action appears…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Southern Railway Company, a Corporation v. Frank J. MaddenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  4. Cooper Agency, Inc. v. McLeodDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1964
  5. Galanti v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Laino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. Cooper Agency v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1969
  3. Laino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. Sipkoff v. WhinstonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Cooper Agency v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API