Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Laino v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 6, 1980No. 85PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

633 F.2d 626

80-2 USTC P 9724

Pasquale LAINO and Minerva Laino, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES of America, Jerome Kurtz, as he is the

Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, and George S.

Alberts, as he is the District Director of Internal Revenue,

Brooklyn District, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 85, Docket 80-6039.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued Sept. 17, 1980.

Decided Oct. 6, 1980.

John A. Dudeck, Jr., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Edward R. Korman, U.S. Atty., E. D. N. Y., New York City, M. Carr Ferguson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gilbert E. Andrews and…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Bob Jones University v. SimonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Johnny Weimerskirch v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. Alexander v. "Americans United" Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jack Randell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. Watson v. ChessmanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2005
  3. John B. Mathes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Davidson v. CommissionerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  5. Miller v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API