Legal Opinion

Arnett v. Environmental Science & Engineering, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 12, 1995No. 3—94—0707PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lytton

Plaintiff Brad Arnett filed suit alleging that he was injured by exposure to fumes from mastic removers and chemical solvents while working on an asbestos abatement project. Arnett sued Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc. (ESE), and Charles Jenkins in their capacities as asbestos project manager and air sampling professional. The trial judge dismissed the case, and plaintiff filed this appeal. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I. FACTS

In his second amended complaint, plaintiff alleged that he was injured while working at an asbestos abatement project at the Canton High School in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ward v. K Mart Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Kolegas v. Heftel Broadcasting Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Ballweg v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Burdinie v. Village of Glendale HeightsIllinois Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tatge v. Tatge (In Re Tatge)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. City of Mattoon v. MentzerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. Rodarmel v. Pneumo Abex, L.L.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. Peregrine Financial Group, Inc. v. TradeMaven, L.L.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. Arnett v. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & ENGIN, INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API