Legal Opinion

Castillo v. Atlanta Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 12, 1997No. 960532-CAPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

Plaintiffs John and Maria Castillo appeal the bench trial judgment denying them consequential damages for the loss of use of their vehicle that resulted from a breach of their insurance contract with defendant insurance company. In addition, they challenge the trial court’s valuation of their destroyed vehicle. With minor adjustment, we affirm.

FACTS

“[W]e consider the evidence in a light most favorable to the trial court’s findings,” Butler Crockett v. Pinecrest Pipeline, 909 P.2d 225, 228 (Utah 1995), and recite the facts accordingly.

Sometime in 1991, Mr. and Mrs. Castillo…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Murray v. Holiday Rambler, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Buehner Block Co. v. UWC ASSOCIATESUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Canyon Country Store v. BraceyUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Exton Drive-In, Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mahmood v. RossUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Eleopulos v. McFarland and Hullinger, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
  3. McCleve Properties, LLC v. D. Ray Hult Family Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  4. Kraatz v. Heritage ImportsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  5. Thurston v. Workers Compensation Fund of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API