Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1912PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Whedbee, J., at July Term, 1912, of GrRANVILLE. The facts are sufficiently stated in tlie opinion of the Court by Mr. Justice Walker. •

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

Plaintiff’s intestate was struck by one of defendant’s engines and killed, while riding on a wagon with J. E. Puckett over a crossing. There was evidence to the effect that the men in the wagon looked and listened and did not hear or see the train which was approaching. They could not see it because of obstructions. The plaintiff’s witness, J. E. Puckett, testified: “When I got there, I stopped, looked, and listened. Neither saw nor heard the train before the horses were on the track; I was unable to see it on account of the orchard, fence, honeysuckle vines, and the cut.” - He also stated…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Russell v. Carolina Central R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Cooper v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Norton v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Mesic v. Atlantic & North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. Alexander v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Johnson v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Moseley v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Elks v. . Insurance CoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Williams v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API