Legal Opinion
Pagan v. Gonzalez
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 17, 2009No. AC 28841Published
1Opinion of the Court
965 A.2d 582 (2009)
113 Conn.App. 135
William PAGAN
v.
Osvaldo GONZALEZ.
No. 28841.
Appellate Court of Connecticut.
Submitted on Briefs October 29, 2008.
Decided March 17, 2009.
William Pagan, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff), filed a brief.
McLACHLAN, LAVINE and McDONALD, Js.
LAVINE, J.
The pro se plaintiff, William Pagan,[1] appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Osvaldo Gonzalez,[2] an attorney admitted pro hac vice to the bar of the state of Connecticut for the purpose of representing the plaintiff in an underlying criminal matter.[3] On appeal, the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Deming v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Cogswell v. American Transit InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Paul v. GordonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- State v. PaganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.