Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Greenville, S. & A. Ry.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 6, 1914No. 8841PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Before Bowman, J., Actions by E. V. Campbell and Jones J. Rogers against Greenville, Spartanburg & Anderson Railway Company, to recover damages to a horse, the property of Rogers, and buggy, the property of Campbell, in a collision with a car being operated by defendant at a public crossing. From a judgment for the plaintiff in each case, defendant appeals. The statute, i Code of Lazos 1912, sec. 2123, does not apply t'o railroads operated by electricity.

Read the full summary

Before Bowman, J., Actions by E. V. Campbell and Jones J. Rogers against Greenville, Spartanburg & Anderson Railway Company, to recover damages to a horse, the property of Rogers, and buggy, the property of Campbell, in a collision with a car being operated by defendant at a public crossing. From a judgment for the plaintiff in each case, defendant appeals. The statute, i Code of Lazos 1912, sec. 2123, does not apply t'o railroads operated by electricity. As to construction of statutes: 56 S. C. 173; 68 S. C. 411; 28 S. C. 521. Charge on facts: 31 S. C. 218; 38 S. C. 31. Electric railroads…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

The plaintiff in each of these cases recovered judgment against the defendant for damages resulting to his property by collision with one of the cars of the defendant at a public crossing.

The defendant operates its cars by electricity by means of overhead trolleys. Its charter, granted by the Secretary of State under the general law, provides that it “shall be entitled to' all the rights, power and privileges, and be subject to all the limitations and liabilities- of railroad corporations embraced in the general railroad law, being…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stem v. Nashville Interurban Ry.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Franklin & Pittsylvania Railway Co. v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  3. Carroll v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1949
  4. George v. LeonardDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1949
  5. Hoadley v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API