Legal Opinion

Hoadley v. Allen

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 1930No. Docket No. 421PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, Acting P. J.

At all times herein mentioned, Ada S. Blake was doing business under the fictitious name of Marlborough School, a private school for girls in the city of Los Angeles. In the year 1927, about twenty-five girls residing at the school and 270 girls residing at their homes were enrolled as pupils and were receiving instruction.

Frank P. Allen, Jr., the appellant here, was the father of Frances Ashe Allen, a girl of about seventeen years of age. Prior to September, 1927, the father made a written application to Ada S. Blake for the enrollment of his daughter as a boarding pupil at the Marlborough…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hodgkins v. Inhabitants of RockportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Vidor v. PeacockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. International Text-Book Co. v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  4. State ex rel. Burpee v. BurtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Teeter v. Horner Military SchoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stewart v. ClaudiusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Bergman v. BoulignyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Princeton Montessori Soc., Inc. v. LeffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API