In Re Settlement of Rudquist
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 245 N.W. 365. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of dismissal of an action brought to determine the settlement of Emil Rudquist, an alleged poor person, to be in the defendant village.
The court found that Emil Rudquist was not a poor person within the meaning of G. S. 1923, § 3157, et seq., as amended, 1 Mason, 1927, id., and therefore refused to adjudicate his settlement in this proceeding, brought under 1 Mason, 1927, § 3161-1. If the finding mentioned is sustained by the evidence the basis for the lawsuit is gone, and the judgment for dismissal is the only judgment that…
2Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Settlement of StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Lucht v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- City of Detroit Lakes v. Village of LitchfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- City of Minneapolis v. Township of IndependenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944