Legal Opinion
Lucht v. Bell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 19, 1943No. 33,314PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
The Luchts, a husband and wife and their six children, brought action to enjoin the sheriff of Cottonwood county and the town board of Amo township in that county from removing them as poor persons from Amo township to Middletown township in Jackson county.
In April 1942 the town board of Amo township adopted a resolution that the Luchts were likely to become public charges on the town and warned them to depart to Middletown township, their place of settlement. A copy thereof was delivered to the sheriff, who informed Carl Lucht, the husband of Helen and the father of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Edwards v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- In Re Settlement of VenteicherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Town of Londonderry v. Town of ActonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1830
- Lander County v. Humboldt CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1893
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robinette v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Thiede v. Town of Scandia ValleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- In Re Settlement of StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- City of Minneapolis v. Township of IndependenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944