Legal Opinion
Bristol v. Colorado Oil & Gas Corp.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided June 1, 1954No. Civ. Nos. 5991, 6057PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHT, Chief Judge.
In Cause Number 5991, plaintiffs seek to cancel an oil and gas lease and to quiet title to an undivided %2nds interest in the mineral in and under the following described lands in Cimarron County, Oklahoma: South Half of Section 16, Township 5 North, Range 8 East of the Cimarron Meridian, and for an accounting for the gas taken therefrom.
In Cause Number 6057, the plaintiffs file a declaratory, judgment action against Quintín Little, who owns an undivided Yi6 interest in the minerals in and under the lands above-described, - to determine the validity of the oil and gas…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strange v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Saulsbury Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Denker v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. KimmelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Christianson v. Champlin Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- R. A. Bristol and Ralph A. Bristol, Trustee v. Colorado Oil and Gas Corporation, a Corporation, and Colorado Interstate Gas Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- R. A. Bristol and Ralph A. Bristol, Trustee v. Colorado Oil and Gas Corporation, a Corporation, and Colorado Interstate Gas Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955