Legal Opinion
Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Kimmel
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 8, 1934No. 891PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SYMES, District Judge.
The appellees, J. D. Kimmel, J. W. Cree, R. M. Gawthrop, and W. D. Goodwin, brought an action at law against the appellant, defendant below, in the district court of Tulsa county, Okl., to recover damages for an alleged breach of an oil and gas lease development contract. The case was removed to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma, tried to a jury, and judgment rendered in favor of plaintiffs for $28,000. Defendant appeals.
On April 3, 1923, the plaintiffs were the owners by assignment to Kimmel, for the joint and equal use and benefit…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Parks v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Schuchardt v. AllensSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Manss-Owens Co. v. H. S. Owens & SonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ralston Purina Company v. J. S. Edmunds, J. L. Edmunds and J. W. Edmunds, Co-Partners Doing Business as J. S. Edmunds and SonsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- Myers v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Hedrick v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. McKeeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co., Inc. v. HinchcliffeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.