Christianson v. Champlin Refining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.
The sole question in this case is whether the inability of an oil operator to connect a producing gas well to a pipe line and thus market the gas within a short time after the drilling of a well works a forfeiture of a lease which provides that: “It is agreed that this lease shall remain in force for a term of ten years from this date, and as long thereafter as the lessee produces oil and gas, or either of them, from said land or the premises are being developed or operated.” and, “For an additional and further consideration of One Dollar, Cash in hand paid, receipt of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strange v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Wilson v. HolmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
- Severson v. BarstowMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- Kahm v. Arkansas River Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Steven v. Potlatch Oil & Refining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McVicker v. Horn, Robinson & NathanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Tate v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
- Home Royalty Ass'n, Inc. v. StoneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- R. A. Bristol and Ralph A. Bristol, Trustee v. Colorado Oil and Gas Corporation, a Corporation, and Colorado Interstate Gas Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Lelong v. RichardsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.