Legal Opinion

Ford v. Ford

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 17, 2011No. 07A01-1012-DR-601PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATHIAS, Judge.

Randall Thomas Ford (“Randall”) challenges the Brown Circuit Court’s order determining that funds in Randall’s employer-funded health benefit account constitute a marital asset subject to equal division in the marital dissolution action filed by Debra Ann Ford (“Debra”). On appeal, Randall claims that his interest in the employer-funded account was not vested and was therefore not subject to division as a marital asset. We affirm the trial court’s conclusion that the benefit plan constitutes a marital asset subject to division, but we reverse the trial court’s judgment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Quillen v. QuillenIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Fobar v. VonderaheIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. TallentIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Bingley v. BingleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Hill v. HillIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dennis and Jeremy Cochran v. Zeroffos Hoffman and John DyeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API