Ford v. Ford
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATHIAS, Judge.
Randall Thomas Ford (“Randall”) challenges the Brown Circuit Court’s order determining that funds in Randall’s employer-funded health benefit account constitute a marital asset subject to equal division in the marital dissolution action filed by Debra Ann Ford (“Debra”). On appeal, Randall claims that his interest in the employer-funded account was not vested and was therefore not subject to division as a marital asset. We affirm the trial court’s conclusion that the benefit plan constitutes a marital asset subject to division, but we reverse the trial court’s judgment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Quillen v. QuillenIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Fobar v. VonderaheIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. TallentIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Bingley v. BingleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Hill v. HillIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dennis and Jeremy Cochran v. Zeroffos Hoffman and John DyeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012