Legal Opinion
Bingley v. Bingley
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 2010No. 02S03-1002-CV-122PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 02A03-0904-CV-187
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
Charles Bingley filed to dissolve his marriage with appellant Aune Bingley. Charles had retired from his employment with Navistar Corp., which paid premiums to a health insurance company on Charles's behalf as part of his pension plan. Anne argued that the premiums constituted property subject to division. The trial court held that the benefits Charles was receiving did not constitute a marital asset.
Because we conclude that employer-provided health insurance benefits do constitute an asset…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Quillen v. QuillenIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Fobar v. VonderaheIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Hansen v. HansenAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Leisure v. LeisureIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. TallentIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of: Courtney Carr v. Beth E. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Ford v. FordIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Bingley v. BingleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Brian Weigel v. April WeigelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- In Re the Marriage of Scott Roll and Carol Roll, Carol Roll v. Scott RollIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.