Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hill

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 2007No. 65A01-0602-CV-76PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

Delbert Hill (“Husband”) appeals the trial court’s property division in his dissolution proceedings with Sarah Hill (‘Wife”). Husband argues that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to award him a greater share of the marital property. Finding that the trial court acted within its discretion in dividing the marital property, we affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

Husband and Wife were married on November 22, 1989. During the marriage, Husband worked as a truck driver, and Wife largely stayed at home as a housewife and a mother of the couple’s two…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Savage v. SavageIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bingley v. BingleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. O'Connell v. O'ConnellIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Bailey v. Indiana Newspapers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Ford v. FordIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Armando B. Quintero v. Maria L. QuinteroIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API