Spitzer v. Miller
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Howard Superior Court; Waller W. Mount, Special Judge. Action by Celian Spitzer and another against Frank D. Miller and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
The two' appellants were the plaintiffs. There are fifteen appellees, whoi were defendants. There were seven demurrers to the amended complaint, some being separate demurrers of single defendants, others joint demurrers of other defendants. There are fourteen specifications in the assignment of errors, the first two as follows: “(1) The court erred in sustaining the demurrer of the Kokomo Loan & Savings Association to the amended complaint, and in rendering judgment against appellants upon their failure to plead further. (2) The court erred in rendering judgment against the appellants upon…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Walter A. Wood Reaping & Mowing Manufacturing Co. v. AngemeierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Johnson v. Citizens State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Hill v. Chicago, Indianapolis, & Louisville Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Hayes v. LocusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
- Spitzer v. WrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905