Legal Opinion

Spitzer v. Wright

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 28, 1905No. 5,461PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Erom Howard Superior Court; B. F. Harness, Judge. Suit by Celiau Spitzer and others against Walter B. Wright and another. Erom a decree for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtEobinson, J.

Appellants, owners of certain street improvement bonds, in an earlier action ’ foreclosed the lien of an assessment against an abutting lot, and upon a sale of the lot realized only a part of the amount found due. They now seek to charge the lots lying back of this lot and within 150 feet of the improvement with the deficiency. The suit was brought by appellants against “Walter B. Wright,--Wright, wife of defendant Walter B. Wright.” In the complaint it is averred “that defendant Walter B. Wright is the owner of said lots two and three in Eosenthal’s first addition to the city of Kokomo, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nordyke & Marmon Co. v. FitzpatrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Spitzer v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. Citizens State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API