Legal Opinion

Hill v. Chicago, Indianapolis, & Louisville Railway Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1916No. 8,968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Jasper Circuit Court; Charles W. Hanley, Judge. Action by Frank Hill against The Chicago, Indianapolis and Louisville Railway Company. From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment on a demurrer to a complaint in an action brought by appellant to recover damages alleged to have resulted from appellee’s failure to keep its promise with appellant to furnish him cars for the shipment of cattle. The errors assigned are: “(1) the court erred in sustaining defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint, (2) the court erred in rendering judgment against plaintiff.”

The record showing the ruling on the demurrer, and the judgment rendered, is as follows: “And *332this cause is now submitted to the court upon said demurrer and the court after hearing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walter A. Wood Reaping & Mowing Manufacturing Co. v. AngemeierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Spitzer v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. State ex rel. Roe v. WeaverIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shull v. DuntenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Chastain v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API