Young v. State

OPINION REFUSING STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CAMPBELL, Judge.

This case is before us after having been remanded to the Court of Appeals. Young v. State, 826 S.W.2d 141 (Tex.Cr.App.1991). The Court of Appeals then determined on remand that the trial record did not support the trial court’s ruling on appellant’s Batson1 motion and was therefore clearly erroneous. The Court of Appeals remanded for a new trial. Young v. State, 848 S.W.2d 203 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1992).

The State has petitioned this Court for discretionary review alleging three “points of error.” (Rule 202(d)(4) T.R.A.P.…