Coontz v. Industrial Commission
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daily
The sole issue in this cause is whether defendant in error, Stanley Allen, who was injured at the McLeansboro Nursing Home on May 5, 1957, was an employee of the home within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1955, chap. 48, pars. 138.1-138.28) or an independent contractor. Both an arbitrator and the Industrial Commission found that an employer-employee relation existed and awarded Allen benefits in the amount of $37 Per week for 22J7 weeks of temporary disability, the order of the commission concluding with a finding that the award would not bar further…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crepps v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
- Lawrence v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
- Henry v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
- Henn v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
- Immaculate Conception Church v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Foster v. Englewood Hospital Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Kirkwood v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Ragler Motor Sales v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Wallace v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Clark v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.