Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. C.F. Bean Corp.
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VERON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Consolidated Aluminum Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Consolidated) filed suit seeking lost profits and damages allegedly sustained by its aluminum manufacturing plant located south of Lake Charles, Louisiana. The alleged damages occurred when the natural gas supply to the plant was shut off due to a dredging barge breaking the pipeline which supplied the natural gas. Named as defendants were: C.F. Bean Corporation and Bean Dredging Corporation (hereinafter collectively referred to as Bean), the owners/operators of the dredge; Bean’s insurers;…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Bunge Corp. v. M/V Furness BridgeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Brown & Root Marine Operators, Inc. And Brown & Root, Inc., Successor to Brown & Root Marine Operators, Inc. v. Zapata Off-Shore CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- PPG Industries, Inc. v. Bean DredgingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Merry Shipping, Inc. v. Merry Shipping Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. C.F. Bean Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Abdon Callais Boat Rentals, Inc. v. LA. P&L CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
- Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1997
- In Re Complaint & Petition of Lloyd's Leasing Ltd.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1988
- Corpus Christi Oil & Gas Company and Corpus Christi Hydrocarbons Company v. Zapata Gulf Marine Corporation, Gulf Fleet Supply Vessels Inc., Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs-Counter v. Houston Pipe Line Co., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.