Legal Opinion

Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. C.F. Bean Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 5, 1988No. 86-4657PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POLITZ, Circuit Judge:

This case returns after remand, 772 F.2d 1217 (5th Cir.1985), with Consolidated Aluminum Corporation appealing a benchtrial judgment rejecting its claims against C.F. Bean Corporation and Bean Dredging Corporation (collectively Bean), 639 F.Supp. 1173 (W.D.La.1986). Consolidated seeks recovery for physical damage to its aluminum manufacturing facilities and for attendant economic loss caused by the interruption of its supply of natural gas. Its gas supply was suddenly terminated when a Bean dredge negligently ruptured a Texaco pipeline, causing Texaco to close the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Daniel F. Daigle v. Point Landing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. PPG Industries, Inc. v. Bean DredgingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. In Re Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  2. Canal Barge Company, Inc. v. Torco Oil Company Gulfstream Trading, Ltd. CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  3. Wren Thomas v. Chevron USA, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  4. Mississippi Department of Transportation v. Signal International, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. Louisiana StateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API