Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 2003No. 03A05-0205-CV-222PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRIEDLANDER, Judge.

Robert and Lynette Armstrong's (hereinafter referred to as the Armstrongs) nineteen-year-old daughter, Hillary, was killed in an automobile accident. After recovering the limit of available insurance coverage from the driver of the car in which Hillary was a passenger, the Arm-strongs sought to collect from their own insurer, Federated Mutual Insurance Company, under its underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage. A dispute arose and the matter proceeded to trial, where the jury returned a verdict in favor of Federated. The Armstrongs appeal, presenting the following…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Summit Corp. of AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Wayne Township Board of School Commissioners v. Indiana Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Centennial Mortgage, Inc. v. BlumenfeldIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Powell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Allstate Insurance Co. v. NeumannIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Jerry Garrison v. Rita BickfordTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Kelly v. LevandoskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Allstate Insurance Company v. John Tozer, Georgette Tozer, Lindsay TozerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. JakupkoIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. JakupkoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API