Centennial Mortgage, Inc. v. Blumenfeld
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBB, Judge.
Centennial Mortgage, Inc. ("Centennial") and David Blumenfeld appeal the trial court's denial of their respective Motions to Correct Errors. We affirm.
Issues
Centennial raises the following consolidated and restated issues for our review: whether Blumenfeld had standing to sue Centennial as a third-party beneficiary under a contract to build a residential care facility.
On cross-appeal, Blumenfeld raises the following restated issue for our review:
1. Whether the trial court properly instructed the jury; and
2. Whether the damage award was inadequate.
Facts and Procedural History
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. Terre Haute Industries, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Fox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Canfield v. SandockIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Prange v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Yin v. Society National Bank IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- William L. Centers v. Centennial Mortgage, Inc., and Matthew T. KaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Zimmerman v. McColleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Witte v. Mundy Ex Rel. MundyIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Luhnow v. HornIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Indiana Department of Transportation v. Shelly & Sands, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.