Legal Opinion

Centennial Mortgage, Inc. v. Blumenfeld

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 2001No. 71A04-0007-CV-299PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Judge.

Centennial Mortgage, Inc. ("Centennial") and David Blumenfeld appeal the trial court's denial of their respective Motions to Correct Errors. We affirm.

Issues

Centennial raises the following consolidated and restated issues for our review: whether Blumenfeld had standing to sue Centennial as a third-party beneficiary under a contract to build a residential care facility.

On cross-appeal, Blumenfeld raises the following restated issue for our review:

1. Whether the trial court properly instructed the jury; and

2. Whether the damage award was inadequate.

Facts and Procedural History

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. Terre Haute Industries, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Fox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Canfield v. SandockIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Prange v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Yin v. Society National Bank IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. William L. Centers v. Centennial Mortgage, Inc., and Matthew T. KaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Zimmerman v. McColleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Witte v. Mundy Ex Rel. MundyIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Luhnow v. HornIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Indiana Department of Transportation v. Shelly & Sands, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API