Legal Opinion

Beadling v. E. Bernard Sirotta & Samuel M. Langston Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 17, 1962PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered

Per Cueiam.

The defendants’ applications for summary judgment were denied in the Law Division for the reasons expressed in the opinion reported at 71 N. J. Super. 182 (1961). The Appellate Division granted leave to appeal (B. R. 2:2-3) and we certified the matter while it was awaiting argument there. The Joint Appendix which the parties have submitted is confined largely to the pleadings. Counsel assert that there was an oral stipulation of facts in the Law Division but it was apparently never transcribed for incorporation in the Joint Appendix. In any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Public Affairs Associates, Inc. v. RickoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Costa v. JoseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Beadling v. SirottaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  3. Jewish Center of Sussex Cty. v. WhaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  4. Berry v. Playboy Enterprises, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  5. Mc Gowan v. Borough of EatontownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API