Legal Opinion

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Reeves

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 4, 1979No. 17173PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDEN, Justice.

Southwestern Bell Telephone Company appeals from a judgment in favor of Ray P. Reeves based on breach of contract and negligence arising from the company’s having failed for about a year to intercept calls to his old telephone number and give callers his new office number. He was awarded actual damages of $10,000 and exemplary damages of $50,000. The company asserts that there was no evidence and insufficient evidence to support the jury findings of 1) unreasonableness of the tariff 2) proximate cause 3) gross negligence 4) malice 5) res ipsa loquitur 6) negligence and 7)…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mobil Chemical Company v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Otis Elevator Company v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Hindman v. Texas Lime CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Port Terminal Railroad Association v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Hammerly Oaks, Inc. v. EdwardsTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Mildred Prunty v. Arkansas Freightways, Inc., and Chuck BaughCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. Atkin Wright & Miles v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Wilson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  5. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp. v. McKinnon, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API