Legal Opinion
United States v. Darnell Phillips
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 11, 1992No. 91-3252PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MANSMANN, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal from a judgment of sentence after a jury trial, we are faced with the questions of whether the district court erred by failing to suppress evidence obtained through a court ordered wiretap, failing to grant an acquittal on Count II of *1189the indictment on the basis of double jeopardy, failing to adequately charge the jury on multiple conspiracies, and, by enhancing the offense level under the Sentencing Guidelines. Because we do not find any legal error or abuse of discretion on the part of the district court, we will affirm the judgment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ciba-Geigy Corporation v. Bolar Pharmaceutical Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Leonard R. FullerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Michael E. Jones, United States of America v. Ralph Milton PfeisterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Santiago Mares-MolinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- United States v. HoffeckerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. William F. HelblingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Paul J. Leahy United States of America v. Timothy Smith United States of America v. Dantone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Ronald BelletiereCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.