Legal Opinion

Cox v. Douglas Candy Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1917No. 1882PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to District Court, Otero County; Medler, Judge. Action by the Douglas Candy Company against W. T. Cox. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT.

ROBERTS, J.

This action was instituted in the court below by defendant in error against the plaintiff in error, to recover $434.01 and interest, on account of goods alleged to have been sold to the Hope Candy Company, a co-partnership concern composed of Cox and one other. After issue was joined the cause was referred to a referee, who was directed to take the testimony and report the findings of fact and conclusions of law. The referee, in compliance with the order of court, took the testimony and filed findings of fact and conclusions of law, finding generally for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burnham-Hanna-Munger Dry Goods Co. v. HillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Mundy v. IrwinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Street v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. New York Life Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Eaton v. First Nat. BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  3. State v. WrightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Garcia v. Universal Constructors, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API