St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Veal
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Does an insurance policy which covers a loss "caused by theft or larceny," include a loss occasioned by false pretense? We hold that it does not.
Briefly, the facts are that St. Paul issued an automobile insurance policy which covered the insured's 1971 GMC Diesel Tractor, or any part thereof, against loss "caused by theft or larceny." The insured took his vehicle to a local mechanic for engine repairs and contracted for a trade of his entire 1971 GMC running gear (motor, frame and transmission), plus $5,000, for a complete 1974 Cummings running gear, installed. Eight months later, the insured…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Illinois Automobile Ins. Exch. v. Southern Motor Sales Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Jackson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
- Latham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- Home Ins. Co. of New York v. TrammellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McMurphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Liggans R v. Center v. John Deere Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Harrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Rhyne v. H & B MOTORSSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Ex Parte DaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.