Legal Opinion

United States v. Ocie Mills

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 8, 2000No. 99-14934Published

1Opinion of the Court

FARRIS, Circuit Judge:

We decide whether the defendants-ap-pellees, Ocie Mills and Carey Mills, may seek extraordinary relief by way of a writ of coram nobis based on their allegation that jurors in their criminal trial considered extrinsic evidence. We reverse and remand for entry of judgment for the government.

The material facts are undisputed. In 1989, following a jury trial, the Millses, father and son, were convicted of discharging pollutants and unlawfully excavating a canal in the waters of the United States, in violation of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., and the Rivers…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API