Legal Opinion
Goetschius v. Brightman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 25, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hinman, J.:
This is an action in replevin. On April 15, 1919, the Davies-Overland Company, a California corporation, having an agency for Willys-Knight automobiles, sold to one C. W. Oesting, of San Diego, Cal., a Willys-Knight automobile for the sum of $3,237.56 under a conditional contract of sale. Nine hundred and fifty dollars was allowed on the purchase price on an automobile taken in trade and the balance was to be paid in monthly installments until the full amount was paid. The contract was in the usual form of a contract of conditional sale, under which the title was retained in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Greenville National Bank v. Evans-Snyder-Buel Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Studebaker Bros. v. MauWyoming Supreme Court · 1905
- Shapard v. HynesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Oakland Bank of Savings v. California Pressed Brick Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Edgerly v. . BushNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Memphis Bank & Trust Co. v. WestMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Clyda TarrenceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
- Commercial Credit Corp. v. MoskowitzCity of New York Municipal Court · 1932
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Clyda TarrenceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957