Legal Opinion

Jenney v. City of Des Moines

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 20, 1897PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Court. — Hon. C. P. Holmes, Judge. Action in equity to cancel a contract for the erection of a bridge, and to enjoin the city council and the board of public works from proceeding thereunder. Decree for plaintiff, and defendants- appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtK’inne, C. J.

*3491 *348I. A careful consideration of this case leads us to the conclusion that the following statement of the facts in the argument of counsel for appellant Killmar is substantially correct: “The bridge in question was ordered constructed by an ordinance of the city council duly passed; that plans and specifications for said bridge were prepared by the city engineer, and submitted to and approved 'by the board of public works, before the board .advertised for proposals; that the board did duly advertise for proposals for the construction of said bridge, as required bv law; that the defendant John…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Owens v. City of MarionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Keokuk Waterworks Co. v. KeokukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  4. Spalti v. Town of OaklandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Arnold v. City of Fort DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API