Legal Opinion

Hamer v. Pennell

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 9, 1936No. Nos. 8148, 8149PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

These suits on promissory notes executed to J. W. Hamer by Williams Holding Company by W. M. Hamer, its president, and-W. M. Hamer jointly, went off on the pleadings. Each of the appeals raises the same questions. They will be disposed of together. The questions are: (1) Whether it was error to strike, as sham, appellant Hamer’s pleas of no consideration ; (2) whether the obligation being joint, and sued on that way, plaintiff could dismiss as to the Holding Company upon its plea of ultra vires, and proceed to judgment against Hamer.

In No. 8149 the defendant filed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. MINOR v. the Mechanics Bank of AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Rhea v. HackneySupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  3. Van Alst v. HunterNew York Court of Chancery · 1821
  4. Stone v. GoldbergAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Loring v. WittichSupreme Court of Florida · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams Holding Co. v. PennellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API