Williams Holding Co. v. Pennell
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an ex parte order appointing temporary receivers. Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. His ground is that the order appointing receivers ex parte, and not after hearing, was not an appealable one.
Appellants, on the authority of our case, Marion Mortg; Co. v. Edmunds, 64 F.(2d) 248, insist that though entered ex parte, the order was not a mere preliminary, nonappealable one, but one which makes no provision for a specific time and place for a hearing and does not provide that it is to continue in force until the time set, and is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Marion Mortgage Co. v. EdmundsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- Hamer v. PennellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
3Cited by1 opinion
- Maxwell v. Enterprise Wall Paper Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942