Legal Opinion

Bahr v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 21, 1969No. File No. CV 2-674-51439PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDearington, J.

The plaintiff alleged that on or about February 22, 1966, she applied to the defendant and was issued a policy insuring her for hospital, physician and surgical benefits. On October 14, 1966, she was admitted to a hospital, and on October 25 she was operated upon for a cholecystectomy condition. The defendant has refused to make payments for benefits under the terms of the policy. The defendant, while admitting the existence of the policy, claims in its special defense that among other questions in the application required to he answered by the plaintiff was one relating to prior medical…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Rochester German InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  2. Ursini v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  3. MacKay v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  4. Ryan v. World Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
  5. Ward v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Julien Pinette and Norma Pinette v. Assurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. Ellum v. Prudential InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1970
  3. Mohawk Mt. Ski Area v. American Home Assce., No. Cv 056905 (Jan. 30, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API