Legal Opinion

Keating v. Detroit, Bay City & Alpena Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1895PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Iosco. (Simpson, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The ■facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff, on the 24th of September, 1891, became a passenger on an accommodation train ■of defendant. The train was made up by attaching several ■cars loaded with logs to the train, in front of the passenger •car, which was at the rear end. While the train was passing over a switch a few miles from where plaintiff got aboard, the car in which the plaintiff was riding was derailed. 'The end of one of the rails crushed up through the- bottom of the passenger car, striking the plaintiff in the breast, breaking his ribs, injuring his lungs and spine; then passed up through the top of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Guggenheim v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Richter v. HarperMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. JudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Neary v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Wilson v. Chippewa Valley Electric RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Gorton v. HarmonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Jones v. Detroit Taxicab & Transfer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Line v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API