Legal Opinion
Donahue v. Public School Employees' Retirement System
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 21, 2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge LEADBETTER.
Patricia Donahue and Madeleine F. Pierucci, retired public school teachers, filed a petition for review in our original jurisdiction asserting a class action for a judgment declaring unconstitutional the 2001 amendments to the Public School Employees’ Retirement Code, 24 Pa.C.S. §§ 8101-8585, and the State Employees’ Retirement Code, 71 Pa.C.S. §§ 5101-5956. Donahue and Pierucci assert that the Act of May 17, 2001, P.L. 26 (Act 2001-9) discriminates against persons who retired before the Act’s effective date of July 1, 2001, because it does not afford them the same…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Singer v. SheppardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- James v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Milk Control Commission v. BattistaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Klein v. EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYS.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Harper v. State Employees' Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Larsen v. State Employees' Retirement SystemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- McCool v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Kelley v. State Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Donahue v. Public School Employees' Retirement SystemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Kelley v. State Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.