Legal Opinion

Klein v. EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYS.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1989No. 111 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1987PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT *

LARSEN, Justice.

Although it arises from complex legislation and protracted litigation, the principal issue raised in this appeal is really quite simple: may the legislature compensate judges of the same class/level of court (in this case, at the Common Pleas bench) who perform the same functions and duties at different rates of compensation based solely on the dates on which they began their respective terms of office. We hold that such different rates of compensation for judges creates unequal, arbitrary and unreasonable classifications of judges…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. COM. Ex Rel. CARROLL v. TATESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. McKennaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Carroll v. TateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Stilp v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Goodheart v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Pennsylvania Bar Ass'n v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. DiazSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API