Legal Opinion
Sadowsky v. City of New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 19, 1984No. 1002, Docket 84-7055PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TENNEY, Senior District Judge.
Harold Sadowsky and Vincent Ruisi are general partners in the limited partnership, Chelsea West Associates, which owns two vacant and run-down single room occupancy buildings (“SRO’s”) in New York City. Sadowsky, Ruisi and Chelsea West Associates take this expedited appeal from an order denying their application for a preliminary injunction. They sought to enjoin enforcement as against them of one aspect of a local ordinance, New York City Local Law 19, Act of May 31, 1983, no. 19, 1983 N.Y. City Local Laws (“Law”). The Law governs the renovation and demolition…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- SMI Industries Canada Ltd. v. Caelter Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1984
- Davis & Associates, Inc. v. Health Management Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- RCA Records v. All-Fast Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- In Re PunkeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1987
- Sadowsky v. City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.