Legal Opinion

People v. Cordish

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1930No. Docket No. 1868PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG,

J.—An indictment consisting of several counts was returned by the grand jury of Los Angeles County, charging the appellant and one E. K. Fleming with having forged certain contracts, and with having falsely and fraudulently taken moneys of certain named corporations. All counts were dismissed except one charging forgery and one charging grand theft. Fleming was acquitted of both offenses, and the appellant was found guilty of the crime of grand theft, and acquitted upon the other count. He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying a motion for new trial.

The first and principal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People v. DayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. People v. KizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  4. People v. McRobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. People v. WynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. People v. McCreeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. People v. ButcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API