Fahy v. LeBlanc
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Packel, J.,
Ancient roots support the rule that judicial jurisdiction will normally not be asserted as to nonresidents who are present locally only because they are witnesses or parties to litigation in the jurisdiction. This immunity from legal process “is not a privilege of the individual, however, but of the court itself and exists that the business of the courts might be expedited and justice duly administered by insuring immunity to those who might not otherwise appear and whose attendance is necessary to the proper trial of a case: [Citations].” Crusco v. Strunk Steel Co., 365…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lamb v. SchmittSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Long v. AnsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Wangler v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Crusco v. Strunk Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Eberlin v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lox, Stock & Bagels, Inc. v. Kotten MacHine Co. of California, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Severn v. Adidas SportschuhfabrikenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Pointer v. GhavamDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1985
- Gekoski v. StarerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Dell v. Probert, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.