Legal Opinion

Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. Bowden

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 20, 1975No. 50987PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Presiding Judge.

Under Part I of the policy the insurer agreed to defend any suit alleging bodily injury or property damage arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of the owned automobile. The policy further defines "owned automobile” as including a "temporary substitute automobile” which is further defined as "any private passenger, farm or utility automobile not owned by the named insured, while temporarily used as a substitute for the owned automobile when it is withdrawn from normal use because of its breakdown repair, servicing, loss, or destruction...” (Emphasis supplied.)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hulsey v. Interstate Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  2. Moore v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. Mosaic Tile Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. StatonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  2. Edwards v. SharkeyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Garber v. Travelers Insurance CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. FIDELITY & CAS. CO., NY v. FonsecaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  5. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API