Legal Opinion

Alexander v. United States and Nine Other Titles

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1950No. 12081_1PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Chief Judge.

These are ten appeals from judgments and commitments in civil contempt, based upon refusals to answer questions put to appellants while witnesses in an investigation by a grand jury of the District Court for the Southern District of California. The refusals were based upon the claim that the answers would tend to incriminate them. A hearing was had before the district court for each appellant and the court ordered the questions answered. The refusals led to the judgments.

The questions asked may be briefly summarized as follows:

Appellants Bissey, Noble and Smith were asked…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Mason v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Arndstein v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Emspak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Blau v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. In Re NeffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  4. Marcello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  5. In Re PilloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API