Legal Opinion

Prudential Insurance v. Chestnut

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 20, 1910No. 2296PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action on insurance policy; from city court of Atlanta — Judge Reid. October 29, 1909.

1Opinion of the CourtEussell, J.

We see no error in the judgment overruling the demurrer of the insurance company. By the demurrer, it is insisted that the plaintiff’s petition fails to set forth a cause of action, because it is apparent, from the contract of insurance attached to the petition, that the policy had lapsed. From an examination of the policy it appears that this is a contract by which the Prudential Insurance Company undertook to insure the joint lives of Thomas E. Chestnut and Euby Valentipe 'Chestnut, the amount of the policy being payable to the survivor. The petition alleges, that all of the premiums were…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. United Benefit Life &C. Ins. Co. v. GlissonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Prudential Insurance v. ChestnutCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  3. National Life & Accident Ins. v. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API